FAMOUS UNIVERSTIY

http://go.onclasrv.com/afu.php?zoneid=1286311

Wednesday, 5 July 2017

How can parents and teachers best educate young children?

How can parents and teachers best educate young children?

As teachers and parents, we follow certain principles in our roles. Often though, these principles overlap and all we need to do is recognise and reinforce these areas.

Ask (the right) questions

When my daughter came out of her class one day shortly after her course started, I asked her, 'What did you do in class today?'. She replied, 'I sneezed'. I realised that if I were to get any useful information about what she had done in class, I was going to have to change my line of questioning.

Although my daughter is only two years old, (and more experienced parents than me would not have asked such a broad question to start with), questioning our children at any age about what they have done in class is a natural thing to do. We want to know that they are happy and settled, and that they are learning. Doing this immediately after class is a good strategy, when things are still fresh and you are still in the school environment.

Similarly, a child’s artwork can provide a prompt for asking questions: 'What (or who) is it?'; 'What colours did you use?'; 'Can you show me how you did it?'; 'Did you like making it?'; 'What other things did you like today?'; 'Who did you play with?'; and so on.

Teachers also want their students to reflect on their lessons, but with young children especially, this is a learned skill. Setting aside a few minutes at the end of a lesson to ask children what they liked best, or what helped them, is always a good idea. It is most beneficial when followed up with 'Why?'. For very young children, providing them with pictorial prompts that illustrate feelings – fun, exciting, interesting, easy, hard and boring, etc. – can often help elicit responses. Using crafts or activity books to prompt reactions is also useful. Reflection will later build into self-reflection if the habit is re-enforced, enabling children to recognise the value in the activities we set them

Reinforce desirable behaviour

Early-years lessons should contain themes and values that are broadly desirable as opposed to culturally specific. They should include sharing, helping friends, saying sorry and forgiving each other, making amends, accepting each other, team work, taking turns and being polite.

In the classroom, activities can easily be developed to include turn-taking and sharing, and encourage polite and co-operative behaviour, but the teacher needs to provide support and encouragement. For parents, letting children talk politely with shop assistants and people in lifts and restaurants is a positive way to keep the context real for them. Also, encouraging positive behaviour when playing with friends or asking for something supports the process enormously.

Children don’t learn these behaviours automatically, yet they are an essential part of being a well-rounded adult. Starting early and reinforcing this behaviour in and out of the classroom will yield positive benefits in the future.

Avoid grading

This is an aspect of early-years education, which can be difficult for parents from a variety of educational contexts to come to terms with. In many countries, children are graded and measured against their peers just to get into a kindergarten. Yet we would never dream of grading our children at home.

Every child has a range of strengths, but these will not be apparent all at once. The absence of grading means that children can develop their skills and try new ones in a relaxed and natural environment. It also means that teachers can spend more quality time helping children develop those skills without feeling pressure to assign a grade to them.

When planning lessons, we need to take all our learners and their varied needs into account. There will be a range of learning styles and intelligences in any class including kinaesthetic learners, who learn best by moving their bodies; read-write learners, who show a preference for information displayed as words; visual learners and aural learners. Most children will have a combination of these things. Learning styles are not set in stone: as children acquire new skills, so they develop new ways of solving problems and getting the most out of activities. Similarly, at home, providing a range of materials and toys for children lets them experiment with different ways of learning.

Of paramount importance is the issue of confidence. If young children can use English in a fun, creative and inclusive way, the hope is that this will support happy, secure learners who, in future, won’t see English as a hurdle to overcome, or just another school subject they have to study.

Praise strengths, but also effort

Giving praise can be tricky. Both parents and teachers naturally want to encourage children and instil a positive sense of achievement, but this often takes the form of quite generic compliments, such as 'well done', or 'good work'. In a classroom, it also tends to be reserved for academic progress. While praise in itself is heartening, it can be much more effective when targeting specifics.

One way to do this is by commenting on the actual thing a child did well, such as sharing, following instructions, helping a friend, giving a correct answer, or singing well. This shows that a teacher or a parent appreciates that particular aspect, and in doing so reinforces it as desirable and provides an example to others.

Another aspect of praise, which is often overlooked, is effort. For young children, this is at least as important as the result. Praising the effort they have made shows that we support them through the full process, and notice their small triumphs. It’s important to note that adults don’t do things equally well either, but the effort is still appreciated.

Develop the parent-teacher relationship

There are many ways in which the parent-teacher relationship can be mutually beneficial. Parents and teachers can both share valuable insights into a child’s personality. Teachers can pass on information about how the child copes with a classroom environment, and additional strengths and skills which they have uncovered through various activities. Teachers can keep parents informed about the syllabus, including themes, which can be easy to reinforce at home. Parents can easily present the theme of helping friends, for example, by introducing a book, cartoon or song on the topic, role-playing with toys, or setting up a play date with another child.

It's most effective when teachers and parents speak to each other face-to-face, but occasionally emailing parents with brief feedback can help maintain the relationship, and encourage a more meaningful exchange of views. Keeping the lines of communication open for queries or information from parents helps make the relationship more equitable, so that the information isn't going one way, as often happens.

Finally, one of the most important ways to develop and maintain a good parent-teacher relationship is simply by showing appreciation for each other. If a child sees a parent and teacher thanking each other, the co-operative aspect is reinforced. It’s also valuable to have your child thank the teacher, and for a teacher to thank the children for coming.

Health education

Health education

Health education is a profession of educating people about health. Areas within this profession encompass environmental health, physical health, social health, emotional health, intellectual health, and spiritual health.
Health education can be defined as the principle by which individuals and groups of people, learn to behave in a manner conducive to the promotion, maintenance, or restoration of health. However, as there are multiple definitions of health, there are also multiple definitions of health education. The Joint Committee on Health Education and Promotion Terminology of 2001 defined Health Education as "any combination of planned learning experiences based on sound theories that provide individuals, groups, and communities the opportunity to acquire information and the skills needed to make quality health decisions." 
The World Health Organization defined Health Education as "compris[ing] [of] consciously constructed opportunities for learning involving some form of communication designed to improve health literacy, including improving knowledge, and developing life skills which are conducive to individual and community health.

The Role of Health Education Specialists

From the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century, the aim of public health was controlling the harm from infectious diseases, which were largely under control by the 1950s. By the mid 1970s it was clear that reducing illness, death, and rising health care costs could best be achieved through a focus on health promotion and disease prevention. At the heart of the new approach was the role of a health educator  A health educator is “a professionally prepared individual who serves in a variety of roles and is specifically trained to use appropriate educational strategies and methods to facilitate the development of policies, procedures, interventions, and systems conducive to the health of individuals, groups, and communities” (Joint Committee on Terminology, 2001, p. 100). In January 1978 the Role Delineation Project was put into place, in order to define the basic roles and responsibilities for the health educator. The result was a Framework for the Development of Competency-Based Curricula for Entry Level Health Educators (NCHEC, 1985). A second result was a revised version of A Competency-Based Framework for the Professional Development of Certified Health Education Specialists (NCHEC,1996). These documents outlined the seven areas of responsibilities which are shown below

Responsibility I: Assessing Individual and Community Needs for Health Education

Provides the foundation for program planning
-Determines what health problems might exist in any given groups
-Includes determination of community resources available to address the problem
-Community Empowerment encourages the population to take ownership of their health problems
-Includes careful data collection and analysis
-It is essential for healthy life

Responsibility II: Plan Health Education Strategies, Interventions, and Programs

-Actions are based on the needs assessment done for the community (see Responsibility I)
-Involves the development of goals and objectives which are specific and measurable
-Interventions are developed that will meet the goals and objectives
-According to Rule of Sufficiency, strategies are implemented which are sufficiently robust, effective enough, and have a reasonable chance of meeting stated objectives

Motivation

Education for health begins with people. It hopes to motivate them with whatever interests they may have in improving their living conditions. Its aim come is to develop in them a sense of responsibility for health conditions for themselves as individuals, as members of families, and as communities. In communicable disease control, health education commonly includes an appraisal of what is known by a population about a disease, an assessment of habits and attitudes of the people as they relate to spread and frequency of the disease, and the presentation of specific means to remedy observed deficiencies.
Health education is also an effective tool that helps improve health in developing nations. It not only teaches prevention and basic health knowledge but also conditions ideas that re-shape everyday habits of people with unhealthy lifestyles in developing countries. This type of conditioning not only affects the immediate recipients of such education but also future generations will benefit from an improved and properly cultivated ideas about health that will eventually be ingrained with widely spread health education. Moreover, besides physical health prevention, health education can also provide more aid and help people deal healthier with situations of extreme stress, anxiety, depression or other emotional disturbances to lessen the impact of these sorts of mental and emotional constituents, which can consequently lead to detrimental physical effects.

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

A Different Perspective on Education

A Different Perspective on Education

Every week articles and editorials are printed about education. The context is always limited to traditional approaches to education, not progressive education. I suppose this is because educators, parents and students frequently question progressive education. As a high school student, learning through a progressive approach, my experience suggests that they should be questioning traditional education instead. I live in New York City where I attend the progressive Calhoun School.

William Evers, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University argues:

We know that to attain advanced conceptual understanding in all subjects, explicit teaching is necessary. Conceptual understanding does not come without the hard work of studying a subject for a long time and in depth. The teacher needs to guide the student throughout and often to impart knowledge directly.

Evers clearly believes in “explicit teaching,” that consists of a teacher lecturing their students. This directs their thought processes, as opposed to teaching the students to construct knowledge. As a student educated in a progressive school, I strongly disagree with Evers’ argument.

Calhoun believes, “People learn best through experience and discovery.” I have been a student at Calhoun for 11 years, and this has been my experience. In class I’m often asked, “What do you think?” As a class, we discuss what we have learned on the subject in past years and from individual experiences outside of school. After further learning about the subject, we consider how this knowledge can be applied outside of our education.

When students are in pre-school, Calhoun teaches them to love learning through an exploratory curriculum that will continue throughout their education. This love for learning gave me the determination to learn and work hard once I entered grade school. Although I was not getting graded for my work, I still had a desire to evolve as a student and as a person with my own ideas and opinions. It was not until 8th grade that I received my first letter grade on my report card. My classmates and I were nervous. I knew this grade would be important for my future and would also reflect how hard I had worked during that semester. Even though getting grades was a new concept for me, I soon realized that it was no different from past years, and that I had to rely on self-motivation and desire to learn in order to do well.

The combination of learning while doing and having fun still applies to me now as a 9th grader: Doing projects like, building a cart to keep a clay dummy safe in order demonstrate the importance of airbags, a seatbelt, and a crumple zone, or having the freedom to choose an ancient political figure to compare politics from that era to contemporary times. These assignments, along with many others, are examples of how Calhoun’s exploratory curriculum has followed me through my educational growth.

Some of my friends attend the most rigorous schools in New York City, but the primary difference in our responses to our educations is that I have developed a love for learning, which they have not. My friends are constantly stressed and frustrated with the amount of work given at their traditional schools, which mostly consists of taking notes from textbooks. Unlike me, my friends never developed a love for learning. Love is rare in a rigorous and restricted environment. Calhoun’s ambiance allows students to be independent by assigning a manageable amount of homework. This gives students an opportunity to have extra-curricular activities that are as important for human development as academic classes. This freedom and flexibility has given me the opportunity to be a serious athlete and to take various classes in the performing arts. Not only has progressive education given me a love for learning at school, but it has also encouraged me to apply it to my own extra-curricular activities.

While there are common aspects of progressive education, each school has different characteristics that define their curriculum and atmosphere. In the Calhoun building, on the floors where most of the classes take place, there are no walls separating the individual classrooms. This was done to create a sense of community, to teach students to adapt when there are distractions and to stay focused. Also, the Calhoun high school does not go by semesters, but by modules. The school year is split up into five sections with only four classes per section on each student’s schedule. This allows students to immerse themselves in four subjects, giving us the opportunity to become familiarized with the material, and not just learning it to do well on a test. This also reduces stress because we are not focused on seven or eight different subjects at once, but fully engaged in four.

One concept that all progressive schools have in common is the relationships between the students and the teachers, and the sense of community that comes along with it. Most progressive schools allow students to address their teachers by their first names, which creates a sense of friendship. I have been taught not to think of myself as inferior to my teachers, but as a student willing to learn from a wiser friend.

When discussing education, our society seems to recognize that we need citizens who are innovative, critically thinking, well-developed, self-directed and who are not only inquiring, but love learning. These characteristics are rarely associated with children who attend traditional schools, though I have developed these attributes by going to a progressive school. When thinking about the future leaders of our country, shouldn’t all parents want their children to go to progressive schools, where establishing these qualities are guaranteed?

Types of Different Degree Levels


Types of Different Degree Levels


Degree Levels Available

Universities and community colleges award degrees at varying levels, from associate's degrees to doctoral degrees. When comparing different degrees, students can consider which program best fits their career goals and academic interests.

There are four major categories of degrees available for postsecondary students: associate, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees. Earning one of these degrees can take 2-8 years, depending on the level of the degree and field of study. Graduate-level programs may require students to complete one or more undergraduate programs prior to enrollment.


Associate Degrees

Associate-level programs offer different degrees for a variety of careers. These 2-year programs may provide the necessary training to prepare students for entry-level positions in fields like nursing, graphic design and other vocational areas. Associate degree programs are most commonly available from community colleges and technical schools.

Completing an associate degree program may qualify graduates to enter the workforce. Transferable associate degree programs cover the general education requirements needed to continue a student's education at a 4-year university. The most common degrees available at the associate level include the following:

Associate of Arts (A.A.)
Associate of Science (A.S.)
Associate of Applied Science (AAS)

Bachelor's Degrees

A bachelor's degree program is an undergraduate program that usually takes four years to complete. Enrolling in a bachelor's degree program requires that students choose a major area of study, such as finance, history, communications or biology. Graduates from a bachelor's degree program are qualified to work in entry or management-level positions, depending on the field.

A bachelor's degree is also usually required for admittance into a graduate program. The different types of degrees available in a bachelor's degree program include the following:

Bachelor of Arts (B.A.)
Bachelor of Science (B.S.)
Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA)
Bachelor of Applied Science (BAS)

Master's Degrees

Master's degree programs are graduate programs that let students specialize in an area of study. They typically take 1-2 years to complete. Along with an undergraduate degree, enrolling in a master's degree program usually requires a minimum GPA and an acceptance score on a graduate entrance exam, such as the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). Many master's degree programs require a thesis or capstone project for graduation.

Earning a master's degree may qualify graduates to work in advanced or executive-level positions. A master's degree is also required for entrance into some doctoral programs. Different degree programs available at the master's degree level include the following:

Master of Arts (M.A.)
Master of Science (M.S.)
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Master of Fine Arts (MFA)


Doctoral Degrees

Doctoral degree programs, also known as Ph.D. programs, are the most advanced type of degree program available. Admittance into a doctoral degree program may require individuals to hold a master's degree, although several programs accept candidates who only hold bachelor's degrees. Additional requirements to be accepted into these programs may include submitting standardized test scores and sending in letters of recommendation.

Completing a Ph.D. program usually takes several years, and often involves the completion of a dissertation and a major research project. Medical-related doctoral programs may have students complete hands-on clinical hours with real patients during the final years of the program.

Ph.D. graduates are qualified to work as experts in areas of business or research, and professors at the postsecondary level. Common types of doctoral degrees include those listed below:

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Juris Doctor (J.D.)
Doctor of Medicine (M.D.)
Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS)
While there are many different college level degree options, the four main degree levels include associate, bachelors, masters, and doctorate.

Kids Are Different: There Are Lots of Different Ways to Educate Them

Kids Are Different: There Are Lots of Different Ways to Educate Them

How did schools get to be like they are now?

Our models for education, both K-12 and higher ed, were basically imported from Germany in the 19th century. Those 19th-century German models were in many ways not bad models for the United States in the 19th century. But now that we are in 21st-century America, they don’t seem to be working that well. That’s sort of the starting point for my discussion.

Why do these German models fail us now in the 21st century?

Well in both cases, as is typical of established models in almost any area, they primarily work for the benefit of the people inside. I quote John Hicks the economist saying, "The best of all monopoly profits is a quiet life." And that is basically what happened here. You have the quasi-monopoly with mostly unionized teachers in K-12 and the tenured professoriate in higher ed. Frankly the administrators on both sides have arranged things, as people naturally tend to do out of human nature, in ways that make their lives as comfortable and pleasant and secure as possible. The problem with that is those are not necessarily the ways that serve the people that the institutions are supposed to serve.
At the K-12 level, we really still have the 19th-century model. That is relatively easy for the people who are teaching, but it doesn’t necessarily serve children well. It’s not sufficiently customized, and it just doesn’t respond to a lot of the newer things we have learned about how people learn and how to present information. It was designed to teach people how to be punctual and orderly and well-organized and diligent and all the sorts of characteristics that you needed to have a successful Industrial Revolution. We implemented it and we did have a pretty successful Industrial Revolution and the Industrial Revolution made people a lot healthier and wealthier and better off, so that was all great. But the structure of the schools was factory-like. The output of the schools was as close to a standardized product as they could make it. If you were a kid who didn’t fit in very well, if you were a square peg and they wanted you in a round hole, the solution of the traditional schools K-12 was basically to use a bigger hammer. That was hard for a lot of people, and a lot of people didn’t get as much from it as they should have. And it’s no longer necessary.

On the higher ed level, the problem is a little different. What you have is the cost of the college education increasing at slightly more than double the rate of family income increasing and the difference being made up for with debt, primarily student-loan debt. That doesn’t work once the debt reaches an unsustainable point. We’ve about reached the point where the student loan debt burden is sufficiently high that the increased earnings from going to college often don’t justify taking on the debt. In response to that we are already seeing changes in behavior as people are getting choosier about where to go to college.
So the pressure on the higher ed system is that it has been built on the expectation of ever-increasing tuition income backed up by government-subsidized student loans. It’s going to have to adapt to a situation in which resources will no longer be increasing and in which consumers are going to be much more skeptical.

In your book, you predict that there are big and controversial changes coming to education, like homeschooling, charter schools, and online courses. Let’s start with homeschooling: Why is it a good model for the 21st century?

Well, homeschooling of course isn’t for everyone. It is, however, very useful for a lot of people. The real advantage of homeschooling for people who want to do it is no one cares about your kid as much as you do. And if you’ve got the time and inclination to put that into it, you can get good results. So that is my take on homeschooling. And The Atlantic article I quote on it shows another great advantage, which is that if you are in a market like New York, say, where the public schools are lousy and the private schools are ridiculously expensive, then homeschooling provides an opportunity for people who don’t have enough money for private school but value their kids’ education too much to send them to public school to still live in New York as opposed to having to move somewhere else. I think those are all similar problems for people in a lot of different areas.

How do online courses meet today’s needs?


My daughter did almost all of her high school on online school. We found that pretty satisfactory because that way we didn’t have to do the homeschooling. She was able to do it selectively. As an example of the kind flexibility that technology brings, her way to do a class was to spend three weeks nonstop on a class. She finished a year’s worth of work in one class in three weeks of intensive effort instead of little dribs and drabs along the year the way they do in public school. And that’s something you couldn’t do without a technological platform that lets you move at your own pace.

What about online schooling at the higher ed level? Do you think it has the potential to replace the traditional college experience?


In one sense there is nothing potential about it. It is already replacing universities to some degree because there are a nontrivial number of people who have been getting degrees online and have been getting them for a while. How big of a competitive threat it is to the whole system is hard to say. I don’t think brick-and-mortar schools are going to go away. But I think for a lot of people, and especially older people, something that is more seamlessly integrated into your life and doesn’t require a 24/7 commitment has a lot to offer.
One of the rigidities in our higher-education model is the notion that you are basically going to take four years of your life and you are going to go somewhere and you are going to learn everything you need to know. And then you are going to be educated, and with your education tank full you are going to go out and live your life. And these days it doesn’t really work that way. Things change too much. Careers change a lot. There are a lot of older people who really don’t want to go back and spend four years as Joe College and Betty Coed going to classes but need to get an education. And I think the online model has really flowered most in that regard. Now whether it will also start to cut into the traditional 18 to 22 college population, it’s hard to say but if it’s going to be cost-effective, sure it will. If you’re 18 years old and you can go to college online, and also work in a job and also live at home, your net cost of going to college is vastly lower than if you leave home, go somewhere where you really can’t work much, have to pay to live in a dorm, have to buy a meal plan, and have to pay full tuition.

Students Of A Different Education

Students Of A Different Education

Don't judge a drop out too quickly, think about the education they're leaving instead. Here are three issues with higher education today:
Colleges and Universities are massive- there's minimal customization, material overlap between years, and only recently has there been an increase in inter-disciplinary study and real-world integration.Students are shuffled to higher ed as though its the only next logical step. There's rarely a conversation about whether a college degree is going to be helpful or required for personal goals.Education in general lacks options- for learning types and individual goals. The popularized University model has made us forget about learning in its natural essence- that it need not happen in a classroom and from a book, but can be through conversation, observation, practice, apprenticeship, or experimentation.

With a little bit of support, drop outs can find a path that works for them and people that are more tailored for them to learn from. But those that self-select for a different course quickly find that currently there is little support unless they cultivate it on their own.
Kane Sarhan and Shaila Ittycheria realized this after reflecting on their own schoolings and careers, so they set out to create a new program. Enstitute is an alternative to higher education for high school grads, college drop outs, and even college grads who are interested in technology startups and increasing their business acumen. The 501c3 provides two-year apprenticeships with top NYC entrepreneurs for those 18-24 years old. Enstitute also props up the apprenticeship with over 300 mentors and advisors for fellows to engage with, room and board, food, and personal stipends.
As Enstitute's co-founder Shaila Ittycheria describes the first batch of Fellows, she demonstrates how Ensitute is a new option for those that are bored by typical college semesters, looking to acquire MBA skill sets, or just want something that's hands on and with experienced people. "We have fellows who are 18 and directly out of high school, 20 year old college juniors who have left top schools out of frustration, and 23 year old university graduates who found themselves unprepared for the job market and lacking marketable skills.”These Fellows didn't take a risk by abandoning school, college just wasn't the right fit. The path towards the ambitions of each of the eleven Enstitute Fellows will now be a bit less windy and lonely- and they certainly won't have to settle for rudimentary University classes.
Though Enstitute is one of the few alternative educations, there are many more to come. Enstitute is leading by "educating tomorrow's workforce by turning startups and small businesses around the world into classrooms." Meet their Fellows in the gallery above.

Sunday, 2 July 2017

New Education Policy

New Education Policy

Before the expiration of National Education Policy (NEP) for the period of 1998 to 2010, the government announced the new National Education Policy (NEP) for the next decade in 2009, called the “National Education Policy (2009)”.As the Education Policy (1998 – 2010) was not producing the desired results, the review process for the National Education Policy 1998-2010 was initiated in 2005 and the White Paper was finalized in March 2007. The White Paper became the basis for development of the new Education Policy.
The salient features of the National Education Policy (NEP) include:

Free and universal primary education by 2015 and up to class 10 by 2025
The allocation for education would be 7% of the national GDP by 2015
The Literacy rate will be enhanced to 86% by 2015
A common curricular framework shall be applied to educational institutions in both the public and the private sector
The level of public-sector schools will be lifted to match the level of good private schools (The deadline for the task was 2010)
The curriculum from Class 1 onward shall comprise of English (as a subject) Urdu, one regional language and mathematics, along with an integrated subject
English shall be employed as the medium of instruction for sciences and mathematics from class IV onwards
For 5 years Provinces shall have the option to teach mathematics and science in English or Urdu/ official regional language, but after five years the teaching of these subjects shall be in English only
Deeni Madaris (Islamic Schools) shall be mainstreamed by introducing contemporary studies alongside the curricula of Deeni Madaris to enhance prospects of their students to pursue higher studies research and excellence and to ensure employment, recognition and equivalence
A Bachelor degree, with a B.Ed, shall be the minimum requirement for teaching at the elementary level. A Masters degree for the secondary and higher secondary with a B.Ed, shall be ensured by 2018.